Masking controls btw are in the Effects Control Panel. However, with time, experience, and learning I understand why the difference is there, and I most certainly do not want Pr to look or work like Ps. When I started video post I wanted just to use the same type of tools and was frustrated. I came into video post from 35 years of pro stills work including running a pro portrait photographers lab alongside our studio for 25 years of that. Some tools in Pr that seem similar in results to Ps are actually nothing at all like the Ps tool. Premiere *has* to work across thousands of images at a time, of different formats/codecs, and so has to have a completely different underlying structure. And yes, there are some abilities within Ps to apply that work on video. Ps is built for working incredibly detailed pixel by pixel modifications on one image at a time or small batches. Let alone how differently the apps *have* to work. Yes, tfat is blending more these days, but you cant simply take a large user-base app and completely change the UI and the underlying code without causing in itself massive disruption. The products have all come from very different paths and user groups.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |